WORKS - PAPER TUBE STRACTURES
JAPAN PAVILLION, EXPO 2000 HANNOVER - Germany, 2000
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Despite construction problems, the abrupt replacement of the engineer,
months long construction delays, and the necessary addition of a PVC membrane
over the paper membrane for fire safety issues, the Pavilions has been
a great leap forward in the field of paper architecture. The main theme
of the Hanover Expo was the environment and the basic concept behind the
Japan Pavilion was to create a structure that would produce as little industrial
waste as possible when it was dismantled. The goal was either to recycle
or reuse almost all of the materials that went into the building. The first
structural idea was for a tunnel arch of paper tubes, similar to the Paper
Dome. However, the Paper Dome was limited by the high cost of wooden joints.
I proposed a grid shell using lengthy paper tubing and without joints to
my collaborator, Frei Otto. The tunnel arch would be about 73.8m long,
25m wide, and 15.9m high. The most critical factor was lateral strain along
the long side, so instead of a simple arch I chose a grid shell of three-dimensional
curved lines with indentations in the height and width directions, which
are stronger when it comes to lateral strain. |
|
| Another goal was to construct the pavilion using methods that were as low-tech
as possible, so they argued for simple joints of fabric or metal tape.
As the intersection between two paper tubes was pushed up to form the three-dimensional
grid, an angle would open and a suitable amount of tension would be applied.
Further, since the paper tubes themselves would rotate to draw a gentle
S curve, the joint would allow for three-dimensional movement. Tape was
an appropriate solution. Otto also proposed a fixed timber frame of ladder
arches and intersecting rafters which would lend strength to the paper-tube
grid shell and allow a roof membrane to be attached, and which could also
be used during construction and for maintenance. The Buro Happold, who
supervised construction, proposed metal joints into which bracing cables
would be inserted at a diagonal to tension the paper-tube grid while allowing
the paper tubes to move in three dimensions. However, the PVC used in conventional
membranes cannot be recycled and gives off dioxins when burned. Then we
discovered by chance a waterproof bag used by a delivery service. We talked
to the manufacturer of the bag, who told us it might be possible to develop
something like what we needed. The two semicircular end walls needed planar
strength as diaphragms. For these we used timber arches that clamped the
ends of the paper-tube grid shell, and then achieved the required planar
strength by pulling cables in a 60-degree from the foundation, as in a
tennis racquet. On this surface we attached a grid of paper honey-combs
in the shape of equilateral triangles, to which were attached louvers for
ventilation and the membrane. Instead of relying on concrete the foundation
consists of boxes made of a steel framework and footing boards, which were
filled with sand for easy reuse after dismantling. |
|
|
|